Resources: Decisions

special feature

Click here to review a copy of a Notice to All Employees by Order of the FLRA concerning the SEC's violation of the law by failing to give WIGIs to hundreds of employees in 2002.

special feature

January 2009 memorandum of understanding between the SEC and NTEU providing for a number of diversity iniatives at the agency. This agreement followed the broader settlement agreement regarding the Merit Pay system which was signed in late 2008, and which resolved national arbitrations involving discrimination against African-Americans and employees over the age of forty in the administration of the SEC's pay for performance system.

special feature

The Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit affirming a decision of the Federal Labor Relations Authority in favor of NTEU that the SEC is required to make back pay distributions to all SEC employees who were improperly denied within grade increases (WIGIs) in 2002 when the SEC unilaterally implemented its new pay system.

special feature

November 2008 decision of Arbitrator Joseph Sharnoff ruling in favor of NTEU that all SEC Securities Compliance Examiners in grades 11, 12 and 13 are eligible to receive higher pay rates for their overtime work under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Under the Arbitrator's decision, these employees were also determined to be eligible for back pay and damages.

special feature

The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) ruled in favor of NTEU, affirming a decision of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that the SEC is required to make back pay distributions to all SEC employees who were improperly denied within grade increases (WIGIs) in 2002 when the SEC unilaterally implemented its new pay system.

special feature

January 2007 decision by Arbitrator Joseph Sharnoff ruling in favor of NTEU that the SEC failed to bargain in good faith and thereby engaged in conduct violative of 5 U.S.C. Section 7116(a)(1), (5) and (8), when it sought to change a terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the parties by unilaterally terminating the repayment of PLUS Loans in the Student Loan Repayment Program, where it had contractual mechanisms available to review any issues that it may have had with the program. Arbitrator Sharnoff also ruled that the SEC violated the ADEA by engaging in the unlawful disparate treatment of the protected class of employees over the age of forty, which constituted a prohibited personnel act under 5 U.S.C. Section 2302(b)(1)(B). Finally, he found that the agency's unilateral elimination of the repayment of PLUS Loans was inconsistent with the express terms of Article 25 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, as well as the terms and purposes of the Student Loan Repayment Program. PLUS Loans are student loans that parents take out to help pay the educational expenses of their children.
 

special feature

September 2007 decision of Arbitrator James M. Harkless ruling in favor of NTEU that the SEC's "merit pay" pay-for-performance system, which was unilaterally designed and implemented by the SEC, is illegal because it resulted in discrimination against large groups of agency employees. In challenging the system, NTEU identified discriminatory impacts against groups of employees protected under federal anti-discrimination statutes, particularly among African-American SEC employees and those ages 40 and older. Arbitrator Harkless found that African-American employees in grades 8 and above and older employees received significantly fewer pay increases than would be expected given their representation in the pool of eligible employees. Arbitrator Harkless ruled that since the SEC’s subjective system for awarding pay increases was not valid or even reasonable, the pay-for-performance program violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
 

special feature

October 2006 decision and order of the Federal Service Impasses Panel on the compensation negotations between the SEC and NTEU. With respect to the merit pay system, FSIP ordered future merit pay increases must be tied to employee ratings under a new five-level performance evaluation system, which will be redesigned based upon recommendations from a joint labor-management committee. FSIP also generally denied NTEU’s attempts to provide further improvements to employee benefits. However, the order contained a clause providing for improved retirement benefits, through an additional 2 percent SEC match to employee contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan. In another provision of importance to many employees, the compensation package also included a uniform pay increase of 6 percent, or to the minimum salary for the next grade, for employees promoted to the next grade. During the negotiations, NTEU raised the issue of how this would affect employees whose minimum pay in grade has been set as Step 14 (previously identified as “Securities Industry,” or “SI”). As a result, a grandfather clause was inserted to continue the agency’s past practice regarding career ladder promotions for these employees. SEC management has assured NTEU that this provision applies regardless of whether the employee has a formal “SI” designation, and NTEU will work to ensure that this clause is properly implemented and applied.

 

special feature

December 2006 decision by Arbitrator Howard Foster ruling in favor of NTEU that the SEC improperly denied a career ladder promotion to a 20-year Broker/Dealer examiner in the New York Regional Office. The arbitrator ruled that the grievant must be immediately promoted with one year of back pay. The arbitrator ruled that the grievant could not be held responsible for failing to do work that management had not assigned to the grievant. Arbitrator Foster relied on the contract language for career ladder promotions, finding that “career enhancement” was the intent and expectation of the career ladder system. Therefore, he held that career ladder promotions should be the norm, whereas the refusal to promote should be considered an exception.

 

 

Search for resources in the box above, or select one of the categories below to review a list of informative resources by topic...

  

Decisions

Decisions by the Federal Service Impasses Panel, the Federal Labor Relations Board and federal arbitrators in cases involving the SEC, such as the Merit Pay national arbitration, the Student Loan Repayment Program national arbitration, and more...

Government Reports

Informative reports by the Government Accountability Office, the Office of the Inspector General, and other governmental agencies and officials on topics of interest to SEC employees, such as performance based pay systems and investigations of SEC actions...

Federal Employee Benefits

Information about benefits available to federal employees, such as health benefits, retirement benefits and more...

Federal News

Links to news sources about the federal government, such as Government Executive, FedSmith, etc...

Helpful Union Information

Links to union information and legal sites to assist in union representational activities...

Regional Newspapers

Links to major newspapers in Washington and each of the SEC's Regional Offices...

Chapter 293 Documents and Forms

Documents and forms used by NTEU Chapter 293...

Other NTEU Chapter Websites

Links to other NTEU Chapter websites...

Miscellaneous Resources

Additional resources, including articles on pay for performance, SEC Merit Pay distribution information, and more...