Select any filter and click on Apply to see results
Article 3: Employee Rights
Each employee shall have the right to form, join, or assist the Union, or to refrain from any such activity, freely and without fear of penalty or reprisal, and each employee will be protected in the exercise of such right. Except as otherwise provided under this Agreement, such right includes the right:
A. to act for a labor organization in the capacity of a representative and the right, in that capacity, to present the views of the labor organization to the Employer or other appropriate authorities; and
B. to engage in collective bargaining with respect to conditions of employment through representatives chosen by employees under this Agreement.
A. The initiation of a grievance in good faith by an employee will not reflect adversely on his or her standing with his or her supervisor or the Employer. An employee who has relevant information and who conveys that information, concerning any matter for which remedial relief is available under this Agreement, will be assured freedom from restraint, interference, coercion, discrimination, intimidation, or reprisal. Nothing in this Section, however, abrogates the right of the Agency to conduct investigations concerning employee misconduct.
B. The Employer will not impose any restraint, interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal against any employee in the exercise of his or her right to designate a Union steward for the purpose of representing to the Employer any matter of concern or dissatisfaction, or of representing the employee before any Government agency or official other than the Employer. If the designation of a particular Union steward in a particular matter raises an actual or apparent conflict of interest, then the Parties will follow all laws, rules, regulations, and case law regarding that steward's participation in the matter (5 U.S.C. § 7120(e)).
Nothing in this Agreement will require an employee to become or remain a member of a labor organization or to pay money to the organization except pursuant to a voluntary written authorization by a member for payment of dues through payroll deductions or by voluntary cash dues payment by a member.
The Employer recognizes and respects the dignity of each employee in the formulation and implementation of personnel policies and practices and conditions of work. The rights and protections established in 5 U.S.C. § 2301(b), Merit Systems Principles, and 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b), Prohibited Personnel Practices are hereby incorporated into this Article (see Attachment 1).
An employee must follow supervisory orders, directions and assignments.
A. Unless an employee fails to meet his or her performance standards, he or she will not be adversely affected by the Employer as a result of carrying out the lawful orders, directions or assignments of a supervisor, or attempting in good faith to carry out such lawful orders, directions or assignments.
B. If an employee disputes the legality of his or her supervisor's order, direction or assignment based on the employee's belief that it violates a law, rule, regulation or published Code of Ethics/Professional Responsibility:
1. The employee will discuss the dispute/difference and the basis for it with his or her supervisor with the intent of resolving the dispute/difference.
2. The employee may seek review of the dispute by his or her next level supervisor, who will assess the matter and inform the employee of his or her determination regarding the dispute.
3. If the employee continues to dispute the legality of his or her supervisor's order, direction or assignment, the supervisor will give the order, direction or assignment to the employee in writing. The employee will comply with the supervisor's order, direction or assignment and, if the employee carries out the order, direction or assignment in the manner prescribed by the supervisor, the Employer will assume full responsibility for that order, direction or assignment, to the extent permitted by law, rule or regulation. At such time as the employee has complied with the supervisor's order, direction or assignment, he or she may file a grievance, complaint or appeal, as appropriate to seek a remedy to any alleged violation to his or her rights.
4. In addition, any employee who holds a professional license that he or she uses in the performance of his or her duties at SEC (i.e., Attorneys, CPAs, Certified Fraud Examiners, etc.) may consult with the body responsible for the enforcement of the Code of Ethics/Professional Responsibility in the State or Jurisdiction in which he or she is licensed for guidance, and, upon receipt, provide such guidance to the supervisor. Prior to the receipt of such guidance, the professional shall not be required to sign any disputed document, or otherwise carry out the disputed order, direction or assignment. If the guidance provided indicates that the disputed order, direction or assignment would violate an applicable ethical rule or rule of professional responsibility, the employee shall not be required to take any such action with respect to that order, direction or assignment. The employee shall immediately notify his or her supervisor that he or she cannot comply with the order, direction or assignment.
C. An employee who has questions concerning an interpretation or application of standards of professional conduct in which he or she has a direct personal interest is encouraged to raise his or her questions with the SEC's Ethics Office.
D. If after an employee follows the steps set forth in Section 5.B. above, the supervisor continues to disagree with the guidance provided to the employee by the body responsible for the enforcement of the Code of Ethics/Professional Responsibility in the State or Jurisdiction in which the employee is licensed, the supervisor may, with the participation and input of the employee, consult with that body. If the guidance provided by that body indicates that the disputed order, direction or assignment would violate an applicable ethical rule or rule of professional responsibility, the employee shall not be required to take any such action with respect to that order, direction or assignment.
An employee is entitled to a reasonable amount of duty time for meetings for representational purposes with his or her NTEU representative. An employee who wishes to meet with a Union representative to discuss representational matters will request permission from his or her supervisor prior to leaving his or her immediate work area. The employee is not required to disclose to his or her supervisor why he or she wishes to contact an NTEU representative. Rather, the employee need only inform his or her supervisor of the general nature of the meeting (e.g. "to talk to my Union representative") and the meeting's expected duration. The supervisor shall grant the employee's request absent a significant staffing or workload problem caused by the employee's absence. If the request is denied, the supervisor will identify the time period, normally within one business day, when the employee may meet with his or her Union representative. If the employee requests it the Employer may extend any relevant filing deadline by the period of the delay. The employee will notify his or her supervisor upon return to his or her immediate work area. Nothing in this Section abrogates an employee's right to union representation.
A. An employee is entitled to representation by the NTEU at any examination of the employee by a representative of the Agency in connection with an investigation if:
1. the employee reasonably believes that the examination may result in disciplinary action against the employee; and
2. the employee requests NTEU representation.
If the particular NTEU representative requested by the employee is not available, the Employer will consider an employee's request to postpone the meeting for a reasonable amount of time, normally no more than one business day. A longer postponement may be granted in exceptional circumstances.
B. The role of the NTEU representative during such an examination is to:
- assist the employee in clarifying the facts or surfacing other facts that may impact on the matter;
- suggest other individuals who may have knowledge of the facts;
- if he or she chooses, write down each question and response;
- if he or she chooses, write down the examiner's name; and
- advise the employee.
The NTEU representative may not disrupt the examination and may not answer for the employee.
To the maximum extent possible, such an examination will be conducted in a private room.
C. At the time that an employee is initially contacted to schedule such an examination, the employee will be provided with the general subject of the examination. The employee also will be told whether he or she is the subject of the investigation or is being interviewed as a third-party witness, or whether, based on all available information, the Employer is unable to make a determination as to the employee's status. The employee will further be advised that his or her status could change at any time during the course of the investigation.
As part of its responsibilities in this area, the Employer will provide the annual statutory Weingarten notice twice a year.
D. At the outset of an interview of an employee who is the subject of an investigation regarding possible criminal conduct, the employee will be provided with one of the following warnings:
1. When the interview is non-custodial, at the beginning of the interview, the Employer will give the employee the following warning:
"You are being asked to provide certain information in connection with an official inquiry regarding possible misconduct. The matter under investigation may involve violations of law, that could result in criminal prosecution of responsible individuals. This is a request for your voluntary cooperation. You may terminate this interview and leave at any time for any reason. You have the right to remain silent if your answers may tend to incriminate you. Anything you say may be used as evidence against you in an administrative disciplinary proceeding and/or criminal or civil proceedings. If you refuse to answer the questions posed to you because the answers may tend to incriminate you, you cannot be discharged for remaining silent. You have the right to have legal counsel advise you and may confer with counsel before answering any questions or making any statements. You are requested to discuss your testimony or statements only with your attorney or other necessary advisors."
2. When the Employer chooses to request authority from the Department of Justice, and then receives authority from the Department, to interview a subject with foreseeable criminal exposure under an express or implied threat that the employee will be discharged if the employee refuses to cooperate in the investigation, the Employer will give the employee a written statement of the Kalkines warning at the beginning of the interview advising the employee that he or she is granted immunity from prosecution for matters disclosed in the interview. This warning shall state:
"This is an official administrative inquiry regarding possible misconduct. The purpose of this interview is to obtain information that will assist in determining whether administrative action is warranted. You will be asked specific questions regarding the performance of your official duties and/or conduct that may affect your capacity to carry out those duties. You have a duty to reply to the questions you are asked and to provide a statement if requested to do so. If you do not answer, or reply fully and truthfully, or if you do not provide a statement as requested, you may be subject to disciplinary action, including removal. Neither your answers nor any information or evidence gained because of your answers or statements can be used against you in a criminal proceeding. However you may be subject to criminal prosecution if you knowingly and willfully provide a false statement or false information in your answers. In addition, your answers or statements and any information or evidence resulting from your answers or statements may be used in a disciplinary proceeding that could result in disciplinary action, including removal. You have the right to have legal counsel advise you and may confer with counsel before answering any questions or making any statements. You are requested to discuss your testimony or statements only with your attorney or other necessary advisors."
3. The Employer will provide Miranda warnings if and when appropriate.
E. When an employee is given a warning under Subsection D, he or she will be given this warning in writing. The Employer may require the employee to sign the acknowledgement indicating receipt and understanding of the warning. Employees will be given a copy of the written warning for their own records. The employee's signature on the acknowledgement will indicate only that the employee actually received and understands the warning, and does not constitute an admission of any wrongdoing by the employee.
F. The Employer recognizes that interviews of employees by the Agency's investigative officials generally should be limited to matters of official interest to the Agency and, accordingly, will not address private matters outside the scope of the investigation except where necessary (for example, when such matters are brought up at the employee's request).
5 U.S.C. Section 2301 – Merit system principles
(b) Federal personnel management should be implemented consistent with the following merit system principles:
(1) Recruitment should be from qualified individuals from appropriate sources in an endeavor to achieve a work force from all segments of society, and selection and advancement should be determined solely on the basis of relative ability, knowledge, and skills, after fair and open competition which assures that all receive equal opportunity.
(2) All employees and applicants for employment should receive fair and equitable treatment in all aspects of personnel management without regard to political affiliation, race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, or handicapping condition, and with proper regard for their privacy and constitutional rights.
(3) Equal pay should be provided for work of equal value, with appropriate consideration of both national and local rates paid by employers in the private sector, and appropriate incentives and recognition should be provided for excellence in performance.
(4) All employees should maintain high standards of integrity, conduct, and concern for the public interest.
(5) The Federal work force should be used efficiently and effectively.
(6) Employees should be retained on the basis of the adequacy of their performance, inadequate performance should be corrected, and employees should be separated who cannot or will not improve their performance to meet required standards.
(7) Employees should be provided effective education and training in cases in which such education and training would result in better organizational and individual performance.
(8) Employees should be
(A)protected against arbitrary action, personal favoritism, or coercion for partisan political purposes, and
(B) prohibited from using their official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election or a nomination for election.
(9) Employees should be protected against reprisal for the lawful disclosure of information which the employees reasonably believe evidences –
(A) a violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or
(B) mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.
5 U.S.C. Section 2302 – Prohibited personnel practices
(b) Any employee who has authority to take, direct others to take, recommend, or approve any personnel action, shall not, with respect to such authority –
(1) discriminate for or against any employee or applicant for employment –
(A) on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, as prohibited under section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-16);
(B) on the basis of age, as prohibited under sections 12 and 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 631, 633a);
(C) on the basis of sex, as prohibited under section 6(d) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(d));
(D) on the basis of handicapping condition, as prohibited under section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791); or
(E) on the basis of marital status or political affiliation, as prohibited under any law, rule, or regulation;
(2) solicit or consider any recommendation or statement, oral or written, with respect to any individual who requests or is under consideration for any personnel action unless such recommendation or statement is based on the personal knowledge or records of the person furnishing it and consists of –
(A) an evaluation of the work performance, ability, aptitude, or general qualifications of such individual; or
(B) an evaluation of the character, loyalty, or suitability of such individual;
(3) coerce the political activity of any person (including the providing of any political contribution or service), or take any action against any employee or applicant for employment as a reprisal for the refusal of any person to engage in such political activity;
(4) deceive or willfully obstruct any person with respect to such person's right to compete for employment;
(5) influence any person to withdraw from competition for any position for the purpose of improving or injuring the prospects of any other person for employment;
(6) grant any preference or advantage not authorized by law, rule, or regulation to any employee or applicant for employment (including defining the scope or manner of competition or the requirements for any position) for the purpose of improving or injuring the prospects of any particular person for employment;
(7) appoint, employ, promote, advance, or advocate for appointment, employment, promotion, or advancement, in or to a civilian position any individual who is a relative (as defined in section 3110(a)(3) of this title) of such employee if such position is in the agency in which such employee is serving as a public official (as defined in section 3110(a)(2) of this title) or over which such employee exercises jurisdiction or control as such an official;
(8) take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take, a personnel action with respect to any employee or applicant for employment because of –
(A) any disclosure of information by an employee or applicant which the employee or applicant reasonably believes evidences –
(i) a violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or
(ii) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, if such disclosure is not specifically prohibited by law and if such information is not specifically required by Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or the conduct of foreign affairs; or
(B) any disclosure to the Special Counsel, or to the Inspector General of an agency or another employee designated by the head of the agency to receive such disclosures, of information which the employee or applicant reasonably believes evidences –
(i) a violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or
(ii) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety;
(9) take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take, any personnel action against any employee or applicant for employment because of –
(A) the exercise of any appeal, complaint, or grievance right granted by any law, rule, or regulation –
(B) testifying for or otherwise lawfully assisting any individual in the exercise of any right referred to in subparagraph (A);
(C) cooperating with or disclosing information to the Inspector General of an agency, or the Special Counsel, in accordance with applicable provisions of law; or
(D) for refusing to obey an order that would require the individual to violate a law;
(10) discriminate for or against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of conduct which does not adversely affect the performance of the employee or applicant or the performance of others; except that nothing in this paragraph shall prohibit an agency from taking into account in determining suitability or fitness any conviction of the employee or applicant for any crime under the laws of any State, of the District of Columbia, or of the United States; or
(11)(A) knowingly take, recommend, or approve any personnel action if the taking of such action would violate a veterans' preference requirement; or
(B) knowingly fail to take, recommend, or approve any personnel action if the failure to take such action would violate a veterans' preference requirement;
(12) take or fail to take any other personnel action if the taking of or failure to take such action violates any law, rule, or regulation implementing, or directly concerning, the merit system principles contained in section 2301 of this title; or
(13) Implement or enforce any nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement, if such policy, form, or agreement does not contain the following statement: “These provisions are consistent with and do not supersede, conflict with, or otherwise alter the employee obligations, rights, or liabilities creased by existing statute or Executive order relating to (1) classified information, (2) communications to Congress, (3) the reporting to an Inspector General of a violation of any law, rule or regulation, or mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety, or (4) any other whistleblower protection. The definitions, requirements, obligations, rights, sanctions, and liabilities created by controlling Executive orders and statutory provisions are incorporated into this agreement and are controlling.”
This subsection shall not be construed to authorize the withholding of information from the Congress or the taking of any personnel action against an employee who discloses information to the Congress. For purposes of paragraph (8), (i) any presumption relating to the performance of a duty by an employee whose conduct is the subject of a disclosure as defined under subsection (a)(2)(D) may be rebutted by substantial evidence, and (ii) a determination as to whether an employee or applicant reasonably believes that such employee or applicant has disclosed information that evidences any violation of law, rule, regulation, gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety shall be made by determining whether a disinterested observer with knowledge of the essential facts known to and readily ascertainable by the employee or applicant could reasonably conclude that the actions of the Government evidence such violations, mismanagement, waste, abuse or danger.